"How come you JWs are so invasive with everyone until the Bible comes out? Soon as the Bible comes out you want to run away."
That guy really hit the nail on the head!
just take a look at this video.
i think arguing or debating scriptures is the most pointless thing ever.
everything at their meetings are so basic with no explanation.
"How come you JWs are so invasive with everyone until the Bible comes out? Soon as the Bible comes out you want to run away."
That guy really hit the nail on the head!
I thought this was going to be a Monty Python thread
i really like what governors w.weld and g. johnson bring to the table.. not familiar with the libertarian party and will do some investigation,.
but any thoughts on this party..
Liberty is a great means to an end. We use our liberties to promote societal health and human happiness. But my problem with the Libertarian movement is they completely flip it around and value liberty OVER societal health and happiness.
Liberty - in degrees - is fundamental to fairness and equality. But liberty - as an absolute - is just plain chaos. We live in societies because we know that working together we can achieve exponential more than if we all worked on our own. And Libertarianism seems to ignore this basic truth. Freedom is about how we can all work together with the maximum amount of liberty. But freedom isn't infinite liberty.
while trying to have a conversation with a trump supporter today i realized the person knew next to nothing about the us constitution, world events, trumps flip-flops, hillary's e-mails, etc.. i have sense decided it is much easier to do absolutely no research and boldly make broad proclamations rather than read up on a particular topic and make concise points.
as such, i will now be telling you why tim kaine was the worst governor new jersey has ever had:.
under tim kaine new jersey gdp dropped by 97%.. humming birds were able to penetrate restricted airspace.. the bridge to missouri kept getting closed.. he made the state look weak by having a state flower.. all the hard working i-pad miners lost their jobs.. and he set up obamacare death panels that were run by isis in planned parenthood vegan centers..
While trying to have a conversation with a Trump supporter today I realized the person knew next to nothing about the US Constitution, world events, Trumps flip-flops, Hillary's e-mails, etc.
I have sense decided it is much easier to do absolutely no research and boldly make broad proclamations rather than read up on a particular topic and make concise points. As such, I will now be telling you why Tim Kaine was the worst governor New Jersey has ever had:
Under Tim Kaine New Jersey GDP dropped by 97%.
Humming birds were able to penetrate restricted airspace.
The bridge to Missouri kept getting closed.
He made the State look weak by having a State Flower.
All the hard working I-pad miners lost their jobs.
And he set up Obamacare death panels that were run by ISIS in Planned Parenthood vegan centers.
this is on the reddit frontpage and sounds super weird.
can it be confirmed in any way by anyone here?.
https://www.reddit.com/r/exjw/comments/4u72dk/what_kind_of_announcement_could_cause_jws_to/.
I too have long suspected a racketeering raccoon scheme.
a 2 million year old hominid has been discovered that had cancer in its foot - making it the oldest neoplasia found in the human lineage.
now, as to why cancer predates original sin by nearly 2 million years, i'd love to hear christian apologists try and explain.. http://sajs.co.za/osteogenic-tumour-australopithecus-sediba-earliest-hominin-evidence-neoplastic-disease/patrick-s-randolph-quinney-scott-williams-maryna-steyn-marc-r-meyer-jacqueline-s-smilg-steven-e.
That's why they are referred to as apes and not humans.
- Vidqun
Humans are apes. We belong in the category of "ape" much in the same way we belong in the category of mammals. But australopithecus isn't just an ape. It belongs to in even more specific sub category - hominin - of which we humans also belong. But chimpanzees do NOT belong.
You're trying to draw a distinction saying australopithecus and chimpanzees belong to a group different from humans. When, in fact, the complete opposite is true. Australopithecus and humans belong to a group that chipmanzees do not belong to.
a 2 million year old hominid has been discovered that had cancer in its foot - making it the oldest neoplasia found in the human lineage.
now, as to why cancer predates original sin by nearly 2 million years, i'd love to hear christian apologists try and explain.. http://sajs.co.za/osteogenic-tumour-australopithecus-sediba-earliest-hominin-evidence-neoplastic-disease/patrick-s-randolph-quinney-scott-williams-maryna-steyn-marc-r-meyer-jacqueline-s-smilg-steven-e.
Sorry, linked the wrong paper in my OP. Here's the correct one:
file:///home/chronos/u-e33153ad3c668a4fe36e2f3d9f2665dbd8596045/Downloads/SAJS%20112_7-8_Odes_Research%20Article.pdf
a 2 million year old hominid has been discovered that had cancer in its foot - making it the oldest neoplasia found in the human lineage.
now, as to why cancer predates original sin by nearly 2 million years, i'd love to hear christian apologists try and explain.. http://sajs.co.za/osteogenic-tumour-australopithecus-sediba-earliest-hominin-evidence-neoplastic-disease/patrick-s-randolph-quinney-scott-williams-maryna-steyn-marc-r-meyer-jacqueline-s-smilg-steven-e.
A 2 million year old hominid has been discovered that had cancer in its foot - making it the oldest neoplasia found in the human lineage. Now, as to why cancer predates original sin by nearly 2 million years, I'd love to hear Christian Apologists try and explain.
"blue" lives matter!
- sheriff david clarke at the rnc.
this bs really makes my blood boil.
The more cameras that capture the police in action the more police misconduct we're seeing. The more videos we see of unarmed people being shot the more we're realizing the accounts of the police officers are being fabricated. We now understand that when a police officer shoots an unarmed person that officer - and their fellow officers - will do nearly anything to cover their tracks - including saying the suspect went for their gun when the suspect didn't and officers will sometimes move objects closer to the deceased's body so they can say they thought the suspect had a gun.
But more to the point, if you are more likely to be stopped by the police for identical behavior and you're more likely to be wrongly shot by the police because of your race - this is clear indication of racial bias. Considering these two factors it's not surprising the figures show that more unarmed black people are shot than unarmed white people.
Simon keeps trying to insinuate that "unarmed" isn't a clear enough distinction. He isn't wrong because all unarmed persons shot by the police are perfectly innocent. Rather, he's wrong because their's a disparity in the ratio of unarmed white persons shot compared to unarmed black persons (6 to 1).
If we assume for a moment that 50% of all unarmed shootings are justified - we would still have a disproportionate ratio of 6 to 1. The only way we can balance out the numbers in terms of race is if 0% of unarmed white people being shot by the police are justifiable - but a full 83% of unarmed black people being shot by the police are justifiable.
"blue" lives matter!
- sheriff david clarke at the rnc.
this bs really makes my blood boil.
If someone is shot and it was the right thing to do - what is the problem?
How do we tell the difference between shootings that were "the right thing to do" from shootings that were "the wrong thing to do"? I think we can all agree a justified shooting is when the person represents a clear and present danger to the public or to the officer. Generally speaking, unarmed persons do not fit into this category.
This problem is exasperated further because, when video emerges, almost all unarmed persons shot by police are unjustified. And we also have many videos of cops who claim an individual was going for the officers gun - when the individual clearly wasn't.
Also, you haven't proven that more unarmed black people are shot than unarmed white people. Links you've posted previously show more white people shot.
No the data clearly shows more unarmed black people are shot than unarmed white persons (38 black vs 32 white).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/
Well first you have to prove that it is disproportionate and we're still waiting on that.